Results / Buildings

Loom Street canopy.

Client
The café's landlord and their architect
Model
1:50, the courtyard and both buildings
Session
Study, 2 days, 16 wind directions
Result
−41% peak uplift

The question

A canopy over a café's tables had lifted off its posts twice in one winter. Both times the wind was westerly, blowing over the five-storey mill next door. The landlord wanted to know whether to move the canopy, strengthen it, or shelter it.

Pressure taps on the canopy

32

Wind directions

16

Peak uplift, option C vs today

−41%

Options tested

3

What the smoke showed

With the wind from the west, air coming over the mill's roof doesn't carry on over the courtyard. It rolls down the mill's back wall and curls back into the yard, so the canopy sees air coming at it from below. The smoke made the loop plain within the first run: you can see it in the picture above.

Scale matters less than you'd think here. Flow separating from sharp roof edges looks much the same at 1:50 as at full size, which is why building studies in tunnels work at all.

Three options

Peak uplift on the canopy, westerly wind, relative to today
OptionWhat changedPeak uplift
TodayCanopy 1.2 m from the mill wall100%
ACanopy moved 2.5 m further from the wall78%
BSolid 2 m wall on the west side of the yard84%, and a new gust at the door
CSlatted screen on the west side, half open59%

The solid wall made things worse near the café door: air went over it and dropped straight down behind. The slatted screen let some air through, which slowed the loop instead of moving it. The screen went up in March.

Next result Four sleeve fabrics. Read the fabric test